UnderStand UPSC (11)
Youtube Instagram Whatsapp Linkedin X-twitter
UnderStand UPSC (11)
Login/Sign up
US
UnderStand UPSC Daily Current Affairs Practice
0.00Score / 10
0 / 6MCQs Attempted
0%Accuracy
24 September 2026 • UPSC CSE

Read the news. Test the concept. Write the Mains answer.

This interactive edition converts each current-affairs item into one Prelims-level MCQ, one Mains-level question, and a compact value-addition section for revision.

+2 correct −0.66 incorrect Explanation after attempt Image/PDF answer upload
⬇ Download PDF ▶ Watch Video
NEWS 1 GS3 • Indian Economy / Inflation & Monetary Policy Source: Mint

Should India Review Its Inflation Target in a World of Rising Prices?

Context: Rising inflationary pressures across major economies have revived the debate over whether India's 4% inflation target remains appropriate in a changing global environment.

Why Is Global Inflation Rising?

Global drivers
Inflation in the US and other advanced economies has stayed above traditionally targeted levels; geopolitical conflicts disrupt energy/food/commodity supplies; protectionist tariffs raise import costs; supply-chain disruptions create shortages.
Spillover to India
Global commodity prices, capital flows, exchange-rate movements and imported inputs transmit international inflationary pressure into India.

India's Inflation-Targeting Framework

Origins
The Urjit Patel Committee (2014) recommended a numerical CPI inflation target; the RBI Act, 1934 was amended in 2016 to give statutory backing to flexible inflation targeting.
Current target
The Centre, in consultation with RBI, sets the target every five years; the 4% target (2% lower, 6% upper tolerance) currently applies from 1 April 2026 to 31 March 2031, reflecting the Balassa-Samuelson effect for emerging economies.
MPC's role
The Monetary Policy Committee uses the policy interest rate to steer inflation towards target while keeping growth in view.

The Case For and Against Revision

Arguments for revision
A structurally higher global-inflation regime, persistent external shocks, and India's deeper global-market integration could justify greater monetary-policy flexibility.
Arguments against
The 4% target anchors expectations and preserves policy credibility; temporary shocks shouldn't drive a long-term target change; revision needs evidence of a genuinely structural shift, not short-term movements.
Key Takeaway: The article's real question isn't 'should the target change' but 'has anything structurally changed' — a temporary food or geopolitical price shock is a reason to weather the storm, not to rewrite a five-year-old framework that took years to build credibility.

Prelims Practice MCQ

+2 correct • −0.66 wrong

Consider the following statements:
1. India's current inflation target of 4% is applicable from 1 April 2026 to 31 March 2031.
2. The RBI Act, 1934 was amended in 2016 to give statutory backing to flexible inflation targeting.
3. The Urjit Patel Committee recommended abolishing a numerical inflation target altogether.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Explanation: Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Statement 3 is incorrect — the Urjit Patel Committee recommended adopting a numerical CPI inflation target, not abolishing one.

UPSC Mains Question

10 Marks • 150 Words

Discuss the arguments for and against revising India's inflation target in light of rising global inflationary pressures.

Attempt before opening the value-addition tab.
Accepted: JPG, JPEG, PNG, WEBP or PDF. The standalone file previews your answer locally; connect the API hook for real server submission.
Use after attempting the Mains answer
  • State the exact target parameters — 4% with 2-6% tolerance band, applicable 2026-2031 — for quantitative precision.
  • Name the Urjit Patel Committee (2014) and the 2016 RBI Act amendment as the framework's precise legal/institutional origins.
  • Cite the Balassa-Samuelson effect explicitly as the theoretical basis for setting a higher target for an emerging economy.
  • Present both sides — flexibility argument vs credibility argument — rather than taking a one-sided position.
  • Frame the Way Forward around 'structural vs temporary' inflation as the key evidentiary test for any future revision.
NEWS 2 GS1 • Urbanisation; GS3 • Indian Economy Source: Oxford Economics, Global Cities Index 2026

55 Indian Cities Among the World's 100 Fastest-Growing Urban Economies

Context: 55 Indian cities feature among the world's 100 fastest-growing urban economies, with 23 Indian cities in the top 50, and growth extending beyond major metros to smaller emerging urban centres.

What the Global Cities Index Measures

Scope
Oxford Economics assesses 1,000 cities globally across five dimensions — Economics, Human Capital, Quality of Life, Environment and Governance.
The '100 fastest-growing' finding
Highlights cities with strong projected economic growth, not necessarily the world's 100 best-performing cities overall.
Indian rankings
Delhi ranks highest among Indian cities overall at 268th globally, followed by Bengaluru (311), Mumbai (330), Chennai (381), Hyderabad (421) and Pune (427).

Significance & Key Challenge

Broad-based growth
Growth extends beyond metros to cities like Amravati, Surat and Tiruchirappalli; Delhi ranks 13th globally in Human Capital and its economy is projected to become the world's 14th-largest by 2050.
Key challenge
Rapid economic growth hasn't translated proportionately into better quality of life — pollution (air quality), weak municipal governance, and the need for inclusive urbanisation (housing, transport, services, jobs) remain constraints.
Key Takeaway: Ranking 268th globally overall while leading India is the key nuance here — Delhi's economic growth trajectory is genuinely strong, but its overall global rank is held back by exactly the quality-of-life and environmental gaps the report flags as India's core urban challenge.

Prelims Practice MCQ

+2 correct • −0.66 wrong

Consider the following statements:
1. The Global Cities Index assesses cities across five dimensions, including Economics, Human Capital and Environment.
2. Delhi is ranked as the highest Indian city in the Global Cities Index 2026 overall ranking.
3. India's urban economic growth is concentrated only in its largest metropolitan cities.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Explanation: Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Statement 3 is incorrect — growth is spreading beyond traditional metros to smaller cities such as Amravati, Surat and Tiruchirappalli.

UPSC Mains Question

10 Marks • 150 Words

Discuss the findings of the Global Cities Index 2026 regarding Indian cities and examine the key challenges in converting India's urban economic growth into improved quality of life.

Attempt before opening the value-addition tab.
Accepted: JPG, JPEG, PNG, WEBP or PDF. The standalone file previews your answer locally; connect the API hook for real server submission.
Use after attempting the Mains answer
  • Name the Index's five dimensions precisely — Economics, Human Capital, Quality of Life, Environment, Governance.
  • Cite Delhi's exact rankings — 268th overall, 13th in Human Capital, projected 14th-largest urban economy by 2050 — for quantitative precision.
  • List all six top Indian cities in order (Delhi, Bengaluru, Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad, Pune) with their global ranks.
  • Name specific smaller emerging cities (Amravati, Surat, Tiruchirappalli) to show the growth isn't metro-only.
  • Frame the core challenge precisely as 'growth vs quality of life' — economic ranking outpacing liveability improvements.
NEWS 3 GS2 • Polity & Governance / Judiciary & Fundamental Rights Source: The Indian Express

How SC Strengthened Safeguards Around Re-Arrest

Context: In Jaskaran Jeet Singh Deol v. State of Punjab, the Supreme Court examined whether a person whose arrest was declared unconstitutional for violating Article 22 could be re-arrested by the police in the same case, aiming to prevent police from repeating an arrest without correcting the violation and obtaining judicial approval.

Constitutional Safeguards During Arrest

Article 22(1) & (2)
An arrested person must be informed of the grounds of arrest, ordinarily in writing (not merely read out); must be produced before the nearest Magistrate within 24 hours (excluding travel time).
Constitutional status
These are fundamental safeguards protecting personal liberty under Article 21 read with Article 22; violation renders detention illegal and unconstitutional, entitling release.

What the Supreme Court Decided on Re-Arrest

No automatic re-arrest
Police cannot simply take the person back into custody after an earlier arrest is declared unconstitutional; if custodial interrogation is genuinely needed, the agency must approach the jurisdictional Magistrate first.
Procedural safeguards
Written grounds must be furnished for the proposed re-arrest; police must explain the earlier violation; the application needs senior-officer endorsement; the Magistrate must independently assess genuine necessity.

Why the Judgment Is Significant

Accountability & liberty
Checks arbitrary police power; offence seriousness alone cannot justify ignoring safeguards; the Court directed departmental inquiry for violations and transfer of investigation to another officer.
Building on precedent
Strengthens jurisprudence from Pankaj Bansal (2023), Prabir Purkayastha (2024) and Mihir Rajesh Shah (2025).
Key Takeaway: The ruling's real innovation is procedural, not just principled — it doesn't just say 're-arrest needs judicial approval', it builds in senior-officer endorsement and a fresh investigating officer, so the same authority that violated Article 22 the first time can't simply repeat the process unchecked.

Prelims Practice MCQ

+2 correct • −0.66 wrong

Consider the following statements:
1. Article 22(2) requires an arrested person to be produced before the nearest Magistrate within 24 hours, excluding necessary travel time.
2. The Supreme Court held that merely reading out the grounds of arrest is sufficient compliance with Article 22(1).
3. In Jaskaran Jeet Singh Deol v. State of Punjab, the Court held that police can automatically re-arrest a person without judicial approval.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Explanation: Only statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect — the Court held that grounds must ordinarily be provided in writing, not merely read out. Statement 3 is incorrect — the Court held there is no automatic right of re-arrest without judicial approval.

UPSC Mains Question

10 Marks • 150 Words

Discuss the constitutional safeguards available to an arrested person under Article 22, and examine how the Supreme Court has strengthened protections around re-arrest.

Attempt before opening the value-addition tab.
Accepted: JPG, JPEG, PNG, WEBP or PDF. The standalone file previews your answer locally; connect the API hook for real server submission.
Use after attempting the Mains answer
  • Cite Article 22(1) and 22(2) precisely — written grounds, 24-hour Magistrate production — as the core safeguards.
  • Name the case (Jaskaran Jeet Singh Deol v. State of Punjab) and list the specific re-arrest safeguards — Magistrate approval, written grounds, senior-officer endorsement.
  • Note the departmental-inquiry direction and transfer-of-investigation requirement as concrete accountability measures.
  • Sequence the precedent cases — Pankaj Bansal (2023), Prabir Purkayastha (2024), Mihir Rajesh Shah (2025) — to show doctrinal continuity.
  • Frame the core principle precisely: offence seriousness cannot justify bypassing constitutional safeguards.
NEWS 4 GS1 • Women & Society; GS3 • Agriculture, Inclusive Growth & Land Reforms Source: The Hindu

Towards Recognising Women Farmers

Context: Women's contribution to Indian agriculture has increased sharply, but formal recognition of a farmer is still largely linked to land ownership; Maharashtra has created a new model recognising women as farmers irrespective of whose name the land is registered in.

The Recognition Gap

Workforce data
In 2025, agriculture employed about 110 million women and 127 million men; nearly three-fourths of rural women workers were in agriculture, versus less than half of rural men; ~41.5% of female agricultural workers were unpaid, vs ~19.6% of men.
Land ownership gap
Women held only about 14% of operational agricultural holdings (Agricultural Census 2015-16), disconnecting many women cultivators from land records and excluding them from credit, insurance, subsidies and extension support.
PM-KISAN example
Women constitute roughly one-fourth of PM-KISAN beneficiaries despite their large agricultural contribution.

Maharashtra's New Model

Activity-based recognition
The Maharashtra Women Farmers Empowerment Act, 2026 recognises a woman as a farmer based on agricultural activity, not land ownership, via a Woman Farmer Certificate.
Inclusive coverage
Covers crop cultivation, livestock, fisheries, dairy, horticulture, floriculture, apiculture and aquaculture; extends to landless cultivators, tenants, sharecroppers and agricultural labourers, using self-registration and Gram Sabha identification.

From Recognition to Empowerment

Key next steps
Build a dedicated women-farmer database; link certificates with Farmer IDs and AgriStack; connect recognition to actual credit, insurance, subsidy and market access.
Important caveat
The certificate establishes farmer identity, not ownership or inheritance rights — recognition and land rights remain distinct issues.
Key Takeaway: Maharashtra's model solves a very specific problem — millions of women who farm family land but whose names never appear in land records — by separating 'who is a farmer' from 'who owns the land', which is precisely the disconnect that has excluded them from institutional support for decades.

Prelims Practice MCQ

+2 correct • −0.66 wrong

Consider the following statements:
1. According to the Agricultural Census 2015-16, women held about 14% of operational agricultural holdings in India.
2. The Maharashtra Women Farmers Empowerment Act, 2026 recognises a woman as a farmer based on land ownership alone.
3. The Woman Farmer Certificate confers ownership and inheritance rights over agricultural land.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Explanation: Only statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect — the Act recognises farmers based on agricultural activity, not land ownership. Statement 3 is incorrect — the certificate establishes farmer identity, not ownership or inheritance rights.

UPSC Mains Question

10 Marks • 150 Words

Discuss the gap between women's contribution to Indian agriculture and their formal recognition as farmers, and examine Maharashtra's activity-based model for addressing this gap.

Attempt before opening the value-addition tab.
Accepted: JPG, JPEG, PNG, WEBP or PDF. The standalone file previews your answer locally; connect the API hook for real server submission.
Use after attempting the Mains answer
  • Use the precise workforce figures — 110 million women, 127 million men (2025), 14% land ownership, one-fourth of PM-KISAN beneficiaries.
  • Name the Maharashtra Women Farmers Empowerment Act, 2026 and the Woman Farmer Certificate as the specific legal/institutional innovation.
  • List the inclusive activity coverage (crops, livestock, fisheries, dairy, horticulture etc.) and landless-category inclusion explicitly.
  • Clarify explicitly that recognition ≠ ownership — the certificate doesn't confer land rights, a frequently tested distinction.
  • Cite Farmer IDs and AgriStack integration as the concrete next step from 'recognition' to 'actual empowerment'.
NEWS 5 GS2 • Polity & Governance / Constitutional Bodies / Electoral Reforms Source: The Hindu

Differing Views by Members a Part of Decision-Making: EC

Context: The Election Commission of India has responded to reports of differences among its members over electoral-roll revision, voter registration/deletion and database management, stating that internal observations and differing views are part of institutional deliberation and that final decisions followed the law.

How the Election Commission Works

Constitutional basis
Established under Article 324; composed of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and two Election Commissioners (ECs), all three being members of the Commission.
Decision-making rule
Under Section 18 of the CEC and Other ECs Act, 2023, business should be conducted unanimously as far as possible; if members differ, the matter is decided by majority opinion — the CEC is 'first among equals', not unilaterally decisive.

The Present Issue

Reported objections
Per The Indian Express, Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi recorded objections at least 14 times over 10 months, on matters including voter addition/deletion, Form 6 changes and electoral-roll appeals.
Centralisation concern
The two Commissioners reportedly raised concerns about increasing centralisation of the electoral-roll database, including ground-level Electoral Registration Officers' (EROs) access.
ECI's response
The Commission does not dispute that differing observations existed, but maintains final decisions were unanimous and legally compliant.

Why Dissent Matters & What Should Be Strengthened

Value of dissent
A dissenting view can flag legal/procedural problems before a decision is final; supports collective institutional responsibility and electoral credibility; dissent is not by itself institutional dysfunction.
Way forward
Ensure full-member deliberation on major decisions; clear documentation of objections/reasoning; retain clearly defined ERO responsibilities; strengthen digital safeguards (access controls, audit trails, cybersecurity) for centralised databases.
Key Takeaway: The core issue isn't whether Commissioners disagreed — a multi-member body is designed for that — it's whether those disagreements around something as sensitive as electoral-roll centralisation were properly recorded, considered and resolved, which is what determines institutional accountability.

Prelims Practice MCQ

+2 correct • −0.66 wrong

Consider the following statements:
1. The Election Commission of India is established under Article 324 of the Constitution.
2. Under Section 18 of the CEC and Other ECs Act, 2023, disagreements among Commissioners are resolved by majority opinion.
3. The Chief Election Commissioner has unilateral authority to decide all matters independent of the other Election Commissioners.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Explanation: Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Statement 3 is incorrect — the CEC is 'first among equals' and does not have unilateral authority; decisions involve all three members.

UPSC Mains Question

10 Marks • 150 Words

Discuss the significance of internal deliberation and dissent within a multi-member constitutional body such as the Election Commission of India, with reference to recent reports of differences among its members.

Attempt before opening the value-addition tab.
Accepted: JPG, JPEG, PNG, WEBP or PDF. The standalone file previews your answer locally; connect the API hook for real server submission.
Use after attempting the Mains answer
  • Cite Article 324 and Section 18 of the CEC and Other ECs Act, 2023 precisely as the constitutional and statutory basis for ECI decision-making.
  • Name the two Commissioners (Sandhu, Joshi) and the '14 times over 10 months' figure to show applied, current-affairs-specific recall.
  • State the specific concern — electoral-roll database centralisation and ERO access — rather than a vague 'internal disagreement'.
  • Frame dissent explicitly as a strength (internal check, accountability) rather than a weakness — a key analytical reframing.
  • List Way Forward measures — full deliberation, documentation, ERO clarity, digital safeguards — for a solution-oriented Mains answer.
NEWS 6 GS2 • International Relations; GS3 • Indian Economy, International Trade Source: The Hindu

India, EU to Sign Trade Deal on December 16

Context: India and the EU concluded FTA negotiations on 27 January 2026, described as the 'mother of all deals' as the largest trade agreement concluded by either side; India-EU goods trade reached €118 billion in 2025 (11.1% of India's total trade), with services trade at €67 billion in 2024.

What the India-EU FTA Provides

Market access
EU will provide preferential access covering 99.5% of Indian export value, with 90.7% becoming duty-free from entry into force; India offers tariff liberalisation on ~93% of EU trade value.
Sector-specific gains
Over $33 billion of Indian exports in textiles, apparel, leather, footwear, gems and jewellery expected duty-free; agriculture gains preferential access on ~87% of tariff lines (tea, coffee, spices, grapes, gherkins), while dairy and cereals remain protected.
Services & CBAM
Market access across 144 services subsectors (IT, professional, business, education) with a professional-mobility framework; the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) remains a separate challenge requiring green production and carbon accounting.

Why the Deal Matters for India

Economic benefits
Export expansion and improved competitiveness; employment gains in labour-intensive sectors; deeper integration into European/global value chains; MSME access to European markets (subject to meeting standards).
Strategic dimension
Stronger economic interdependence can complement India-EU cooperation on technology, supply-chain resilience, climate action and economic security.
Key Takeaway: Calling this the 'mother of all deals' isn't just rhetoric — with 90.7% of Indian exports becoming duty-free and 144 services subsectors opened up, the scale here dwarfs India's other recent FTAs, but CBAM is the quiet catch: tariff-free access doesn't mean EU climate-compliance requirements disappear.

Prelims Practice MCQ

+2 correct • −0.66 wrong

Consider the following statements:
1. India-EU FTA negotiations were concluded on 27 January 2026.
2. Under the agreement, dairy and cereals are fully opened to EU tariff concessions without restriction.
3. The agreement provides market access across 144 services subsectors.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Explanation: Statements 1 and 3 are correct. Statement 2 is incorrect — dairy and cereals remain protected as sensitive sectors, not fully opened.

UPSC Mains Question

10 Marks • 150 Words

Discuss the key provisions of the India-EU Free Trade Agreement and examine the opportunities and challenges it presents for India, including the CBAM issue.

Attempt before opening the value-addition tab.
Accepted: JPG, JPEG, PNG, WEBP or PDF. The standalone file previews your answer locally; connect the API hook for real server submission.
Use after attempting the Mains answer
  • Use the precise figures — €118 billion goods trade (2025, 11.1% of total), €67 billion services (2024), 99.5%/90.7% EU access, 93% Indian access.
  • Name the protected sectors (dairy, cereals) versus the gaining sectors (textiles, leather, gems/jewellery, agriculture) as a contrast pair.
  • Cite the 144 services subsectors and the professional-mobility framework as the services dimension.
  • Flag CBAM explicitly as a separate, ongoing challenge that tariff concessions alone do not resolve — a key critical-thinking point.
  • Note the 27 January 2026 conclusion date and 'mother of all deals' framing to show factual and contextual precision.

← Browse all UPSC Current Affairs editions

UnderStand UPSC logo

A Platform OF The Students
For The Students
By The Students

Follow Us On:

Instagram Youtube Linkedin Whatsapp X-twitter

Student Desk

Student Testimonial

Our Courses

Syllabus

Help Desk

Login

Contact Us

Support

FAQs

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Cancellation/ Refund Policy

Career

Free Resources

Daily Current Affairs

UPSC PYQ

UPSC Prelims Quizzes

UPSC Static Quizzes

Static Content Revision

UPSC CSE GS Mains Micro-Syllabus

NCERT Books

IGNOU

NIOS

Demo Lectures

Strategy

Blog

Download Our App

UnderStand UPSC android Old app
UnderStand UPSC iphone Old app

Copyright © 2026 USARAMBHA EDUCATION (UnderStand UPSC). All Rights Reserved.

C.R.O.W.N. of AIR-1