Menstrual health in schools linked to Article 21: Supreme Court

Context
The Supreme Court has held that menstrual health and menstrual hygiene management (MHM) in schools is an essential part of the fundamental right to life and dignity under Article 21.

Directions issued by the Supreme Court
• States and Union Territories must ensure:
• Functional toilets in all schools
• Free sanitary napkins
• Installation of sanitary napkin vending machines

Other Rights Recognised Under Article 21 (with case laws)

  1. Right to Privacy – Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017)
  2. Right to Live with Human Dignity – Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
  3. Right to Education (up to 14 years) – Unni Krishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1993)
  4. Right to Clean Environment – Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar (1991)
  5. Right to Livelihood – Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1985)
  6. Right to Shelter – Chameli Singh v. State of U.P. (1996)
  7. Right to Health – Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity (1996)
  8. Right to Reproductive Choice – Suchita Srivastava v. Chandigarh Administration (2009)
  9. Right to Speedy TrialHussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar (1979)
  10. Right to Free Legal Aid – M.H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra (1978)
PYQ – 2019, Ans – B
PYQ – 2021, Ans – C
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted

Menstrual health in schools linked to Article 21: Supreme Court

Got a question? We're here to help!

Our dedicated Student Support team is ready to assist you and guide you every step of the way.
Reach out to us, and let’s tackle your queries together!

Copyright © 2026 USARAMBHA EDUCATION (UnderStand UPSC). All Rights Reserved.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x