Judicial Impeachment After Resignation: Constitutional Debate

Context: Judicial impeachment after resignation
The editorial argues that Parliament should not continue impeachment proceedings against former Justice Yashwant Varma after his resignation.

The central argument is that impeachment is meant only to remove a sitting judge, not to examine the conduct of a person who no longer holds judicial office.

Basics

Constitutional Provisions

Article 121

Parliament cannot discuss the conduct of a Supreme Court or High Court judge except on a motion for removal.

Article 124(4)

Provides for removal of a Supreme Court judge.

Article 124(5)

Allows Parliament to regulate the removal procedure by law.

Article 217(1)(b)

A High Court judge may resign by writing to the President.

Parliamentary Law

Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968

This Act prescribes the procedure for investigation and removal of judges.

Purpose of Impeachment

Impeachment is not a punishment.

Its sole objective is to remove a sitting judge on the ground of:

  • Proved misbehaviour
  • Incapacity

Editorial’s Key Arguments

1. Resignation Ends the Removal Process

Once a judge resigns, the constitutional purpose of impeachment becomes infructuous because there is no sitting judge left to remove.

2. Parliament Should Avoid Debating Former Judge’s Conduct

The editorial argues that Parliament should not debate the conduct of a person who is no longer a judge.

3. Criminal Misconduct Should Follow Criminal Law

If any criminal misconduct is disclosed, it should be dealt with under ordinary criminal law, not through impeachment.

4. Risk to Judicial Independence

Continuing impeachment after resignation may create an undesirable constitutional precedent and may affect judicial independence.

Significance

This topic is important for understanding:

  • Separation of powers
  • Judicial accountability
  • Parliamentary privilege
  • Judicial independence
  • Constitutional limits on impeachment

Key Takeaway

Impeachment is a constitutional removal mechanism, not a post-retirement punishment mechanism. Once the judge resigns, ordinary law should deal with any criminality.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted

Judicial Impeachment After Resignation: Constitutional Debate

Got a question? We're here to help!

Our dedicated Student Support team is ready to assist you and guide you every step of the way.
Reach out to us, and let’s tackle your queries together!

Copyright © 2026 USARAMBHA EDUCATION (UnderStand UPSC). All Rights Reserved.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x